Monitoring.-
the project was a key issue to achieve what was already designed in the
application form. We achieved it through different means and task:
- permanent communication via email, skype
-the creation
of a simple but connected network with blogs; google tech; facebook, etc..
- term
report: two templates were designed to obtain information from the partners:
one for the videoconferences and another for tasks and activities different
from that: mobilities; workshops; hand made products. It was intended as a
monthly report but it turned out in a term report because each term the work
was based on a different topic.
- meeting
during the mobilities: it was always an important part of it. There went
through a check list to revised what have been done; pros and cons and we
planned what was coming next according to the project schedule. We decided how
to carry it out; changes or add new ideas. Agendas of every mobility are on the
blog.
- minutes
were written up after every meeting and send to every partner to make clear the
agreements and also everything discussed. The agenda on the blog was also
updated with every change.
- the
project coordinator was in charge of reminding pending tasks if something was
not finished in time.
-uploading
or directly working on the presentation, post or any other online tool we
needed for every purpose.
-the
reports after each mobility.
Evaluation- We were
well aware of the fact that we had to
evaluate its progress constantly and systematically to ensure the success of our project.
The AREAS
we focussed on and the INSTRUMENTS we
used were:
-
Participation: students (families, teachers, partners) By means of Google technology
Spain
created a set of questionnaires to do so. They were shared with the rest of the
partners so they can do a similar assessment. Children were also asked to make
reflections on their participation in presentations.
- The work
plan was mainly revised in the different project meetings. We revised every term’s
products, results;
communication; project meetings and according to our feedback from every school either we
continued with our agenda or we adapted something to fit better the situation
(changing the topic; using the same on line tools to make things easier;
arranging the groups and so on).
-
Mobilities (organization, problems, relevant products, agenda before meetings, oncoming
tasks) by means of on line
questionnaires (Google technology), control lists (to be in control of the
tasks required), direct observation of children (their attitudes; their
outcomes), on line board game
Impact.- The impact was very positive
specially as regards children. In most of the schoosl they became really aware
of being European citizens and more motivated to language learning.
Our sources
to gather information about it:
- a
rubric.- the first year of the project the knowledge and attitude of the
participating students on the subject addressed by our project (cultural and
language as unseen elements in tellecollaboration) were tested through a rubric
designed for the project coordinators. The same procedure was followed at the
end of the project. The results were compared to evaluate the impact the
project had on the knowledge and attitude of the participants. This rubric was
specially designed for the grown-ups because they are more directly engaged in
collaboration using videoconferences and on line tools.
-the
schools´ atmosphere during the developing of the project.
- to
measure the impact we also looked at the rest of the on line questionnaires,
direct observation and outcomes. The preschoolers deserve a special mention at
this point. They were really enthusiastic about videoconferencing and the real
proof that communicating in a real context and for a real purpose makes a
difference.
- our
blog.- We also check the impact in the number of visitors (about 20, 000) to
our site. Taking into account we are small schools except for Poland and Italy it is quite a number . Also the interaction with
the social network of Finland .
No comments:
Post a Comment